County council made no decision on request to negotiate a lower development charge

It was a door that nobody really wanted to open on June 24 when county council refused to make a de­cision about development char­ges relief for two Mapleton businesses.

Councillor John Green told council his municipality has businesses seeking relief from the development charges levied by the county. He said his township council has gone as far as it can reducing its own fees.

Green said one industry is expanding and another needs a new building, and there was some threat that at least one might leave the community if it gets no relief from the $2.94 per square foot in industrial development charges levied by the county.

Green said he is asking for the chance of negotiations.

One is an agricultural-related busi­ness and the other is in furni­ture. He said the latter supplies wood and has been in the community for 30 years.

“Will the county negotiate similar to what is done at the local level?” Green asked.

He said one is a “fast grow­ing company that wants a fin­an­cial break” from the $64,000 development charge the county will levy on its expansion.

He added, “I have sympathy for the companies – and I have sympathy for the county.”

The problem with reduced development charges is the money must be made up some­where else, and that means all other taxpayers have to pay to make up that reduction.

For councillor Mike Broom­head, the Mayor of Wellington North, the answer is easy.

He said his township is “way up there [with develop­ment charges] and people still seem to develop.” He said Wellington North has raised $500,000 in devel­opment fees, and he asked how the county would explain to those who paid the fees in his community why a neighbour is suddenly getting a big financial break.

“If you waive the fee at the county level, a lot of people will be upset in Wellington North,” Broomhead said, adding, “They’ll start the bon­fires.”

In the east, the answer appeared to be similar.

Erin Mayor and county coun­cillor Rod Finnie agreed with Broomhead.

“New development – it is substantially proven – does not pay for itself,” he said. “It con­sumes more” in municipal ser­vic­es than it pays in property taxes.

In fact, the province allow­ed the municipalities to charge development fees for the simple reason new develop­ment was taking advantage of all the services already paid for by local taxpayers, and it deemed that to be unfair.

Finnie said it is his experi­ence everybody wants a break, and if the county wants to supply it, it should throw the fees out. He said realtors will tell people there are three rules for buying land: location, location, location.

“Wellington is a great place to live, work and play” and that is why industries “come here,” Finnie said. He added if a busines­ses cannot afford to pay devel­op­ment fees, “It’s not a viable business. The choice is to collect development charges or [property] taxes.”

Finnie said most busines­ses “would rather pay once” through development charges and get the cost out of the way than to be hit constantly with higher taxes to make up the difference as others take advantage of such breaks.

He said the $500,000 that Broomhead’s council has paid in Wellington North is money residents do not have to pay on their tax bills.

“I hope we don’t take this step,” Finnie concluded.

Councillor Lou Maieron said Wellington County is a big place and county council is due to reconsider its develop­ment charges soon. He said perhaps a sliding scale of fees might help those seeking more industry. He noted in Erin, 97% of the tax base is residential.

Green told council, “We’re building a lot of homes. A lot of neighbours are putting the em­phasis on homes.”

The issue is neighbours out­side of Wellington County have low industrial and commercial development charges, and some businesses move there to escape the development charg­es in the county.

Treasurer Craig Dyer said the county is due to start its next study on development char­ges late next year.

 

Comments