Today's date: Monday April 23, 2018
column width padding column width padding
The Wellington Advertiser Masthead Logo

We Cover The County...
40,251 Audited Circulation

WEEKLY POLL   |   Community News   |   EQUINE   |   Schools & Buses

Facebook Slug
WA 50th Banner
column width padding column width padding

Puslinch council may rethink deposit policy regarding community centre rentals

by Mike Robinson

ABERFOYLE - Puslinch councillors may take another look at the way deposits are charged to annual or ongoing rental groups.

On June 7, council reviewed a letter by Barbara Murphy regarding rental of the Puslinch Community Centre.

Murphy wrote “on behalf of the Aberfoyle Potters’ Market, a non-profit group of potters that show and sell their ceramic art and pottery once a year at the Puslinch Community Centre.”

Murphy called the centre  “a perfect facility for our show.”

In booking for its third year “it came to my attention when I called to verify the dates, and I was informed that policies around payment for the facility booking had changed and that a 50% deposit would be required one week after booking the space.”

Murphy was taken aback as the township had not previously collected such deposits.

“I had to pay the fee from my own personal funds,” said Murphy. “As a senior on a fixed income, this was quite a stretch for me. We have always paid on time, have never cancelled an event and would like to proceed ... in the PCC.”

She suspected hers was not the only group to experience this problem.

Murphy asked if the deposit for annual non-profit deposits could be switched from 50 to 15%. Then, with the full amount payable one month before the event the deposit could be retained to hold the next year’s booking.

“The township then has the full amount as well as a deposit,” she said.

A motion before council was to forward the letter to staff for a June 19 report to council as it reviews policies related to rentals of its recreation facilities.

Councillor Susan Fielding said she understood what the renter referred to and asked that the letter be considered within that report.

Councillor Matthew Bulmer expressed similar views.

He said when the deposit policy was initially discussed, he thought of it in terms of single-use rentals.

“I had not considered the impact on continual rentals. I think (Murphy) is making a reasonable suggestion.”


June 16, 2017


Tell Us What You Think

Login to submit a comment

Comments appearing on this website are the opinion of the comment writer and do not represent the opinion of the Wellington Advertiser. Comments that attack other individuals or are offensive, unsubstantiated or otherwise inappropriate will be removed. You must register or log in in order to post a comment. For more information, read our detailed Comment Policy and Guidelines.




Wellington North Guide 2017-2018

Related Stories

  • Ice schedule conflicts taking place at Aberfoyle ice pad
  • Proposal for shoulder paving on local highways may be impossible
  • Council wants more information before deciding on pit infilling
  • Stokley concerned with how costs will be covered
  • Shorter may be better for email addresses
  • Traffic counts may not be helpful in setting speed limits in Puslinch Township
  • Pedestrian bridge model should be investigated
  • Surplus farm home severance issue reaches Puslinch councillors
  • Cox Construction applies to expand gravel pit
  • Possible unity in water protection rules?
  • Year one: Dennis Lever sees much to be proud of in Puslinch
  • McClintock trailer park applies for sewage upgrades
  • Puslinch development charges to jump 4.3%
  • Resident offers idea for future focus for Puslinch
  • Puslinch council concerned residents may foot bill to protect city water supply
  • Sticky situation over use of ice time at Optimist Recreation Centre in Aberfoyle
  • column width padding column width padding column width padding

    The Wellington Advertiser





    Digital Publications


    Twitter Logo

    Free Press News Network Logo