Today's date: Thursday April 26, 2018
column width padding column width padding
The Wellington Advertiser Masthead Logo

We Cover The County...
40,251 Audited Circulation

WEEKLY POLL   |   Community News   |   EQUINE   |   Schools & Buses

Facebook Slug
WA 50th Banner
column width padding column width padding

Split Decision

by Olivia Rutt and Jaime Myslik

Ontario’s new OHIP+ proposal

A good start

With last week’s “balanced” provincial budget, came a somewhat surprising announcement about universal pharmacare for those aged 24 and under.

Unlike the senior drug benefit plan already in place, this allows youths access to 4,400 medications with no deductible, co-payments or cash exchange.

This will give better access to much-needed puffers, insulin and many other drugs that will treat both common and acute conditions, as well as drugs for childhood cancers and other diseases.  

This is great news for young people in Ontario.

Right now those who have finished post-secondary education and are no longer covered under parental plans get stuck in limbo. Some are unable to afford medications while they are either unemployed, in a contract position or in a position with no benefit plan.

Children will no longer have to rely on what is or is not covered by parental plans. Parents can breathe easy knowing that for the first 24 years of their children’s lives, most medications will be covered. A diagnosis now means there will be treatment.

PC leader Patrick Brown opposes letting wealthy families use the same system. The universal health care system should not discriminate based on how much parents make.

I applaud the endeavour and hope this brings us one step closer to having a universal pharmacare plan for all citizens.

– Olivia


Consider family income

Last week the Ontario government introduced OHIP+, Canada’s first pharmacare plan.

The idea is that it will cover 100 per cent of the cost of 4,400 prescribed drugs for some Ontarians.

But there’s a catch.

The plan only applies to children and youths who are 24 years of age and under. And it applies to every youth, regardless of family circumstance.

So let’s think about this.

What about the child whose parents have full drug coverage through their jobs? They already have a drug plan and yet now the government is asking taxpayers cough up funds too?

The government argues that the plan is truly universal; it doesn’t discriminate or point fingers.

But drug plan coverage isn’t something kids go around talking about at recess. You don’t hear whispers of “my parents have 100% drug coverage, do yours?”

No, they just let mom and dad deal with it.

So, instead of making pharmacare free for all children regardless of circumstance, wouldn’t it make more sense for family income to be taken into account and have it apply to anyone who needs it?

Because for every child receiving double coverage there’s a recent post-secondary graduate who’s off their parent’s drug plan and looking to land their first full-time job, or a recently-unemployed person who desperately needs a certain medication but can no longer afford it.

– Jaime

Vol 50 Issue 18


Tell Us What You Think

Login to submit a comment

Comments appearing on this website are the opinion of the comment writer and do not represent the opinion of the Wellington Advertiser. Comments that attack other individuals or are offensive, unsubstantiated or otherwise inappropriate will be removed. You must register or log in in order to post a comment. For more information, read our detailed Comment Policy and Guidelines.




Community Guide Spring 2018


Barrie Hopkins
Barrie Hopkins
Barrie Hopkins
Barrie Hopkins
Bruce Whitestone
Ray Wiseman
Ray Wiseman
Ray Wiseman
Stephen Thorning
Stephen Thorning

Recent Columns

Bits and Pieces

  • Signature bonnet
  • Digital pantomime
  • Connect the dots
  • Generation gap
  • Little things
  • Tylenol kick
  • This Little Piggy
  • Nature's best
  • Canada's Business

  • The decline of civility
  • Irrational exuberance II
  • Speak up
  • An enduring register
  • A government assessment after one year in office
  • Gauge signals
  • Unpatriotic
  • Inevitable
  • Comment from Ottawa

  • The Syria question
  • Reflecting on 2016
  • Open, transparent combat mission?
  • Bad for businesses
  • Have your voice heard on electoral reform
  • Open and transparent?
  • Assisted dying
  • Leadership bid
  • Life-wise

  • Retirement
  • Canadas scarcity of calamity
  • Often we mirror our parents
  • Putting up with put-downs
  • A tale of two landlords
  • A letter from the campsite
  • Two shades of black
  • Precious memories
  • Queen's Park Report

  • Back to work
  • Merry Christmas
  • Remembering them
  • High-cost hydro
  • Six important issues
  • Emancipation Day
  • Great Lakes
  • Happy Canada Day
  • Special to the Advertiser

  • Death of JFK changed the world
  • Split Decision

  • Minimum wage earner tax cut
  • Storytelling methods
  • $6.7 million provincial deficit
  • Government funded childcare
  • Lower the voting age to 16
  • Receiving Belgian royals
  • PC Party leadership vote
  • Judged sports in the Olympics
  • Staying Connected

  • It’s all about staying connected.
  • Stray Casts

  • Final lines: Its been great
  • Thorning Revisited

  • Erin’s worst fire burned out six businesses in 1913
  • Village of Elora bought its first fire engine in 1859
  • Wellington County blood donor clinics began in 1950
  • 1881 books provide unique glimpse of local agriculture
  • Coroner’s jury blamed long working hours for 1906 wreck
  • A backward glance at Elora’s Metcalfe Street
  • Community news from the Mapleton Township area
  • Dr. McQuibban a remarkable figure in Wellington
  • Valuing Our History

  • Hustonville founded, thrived, vanished in 20 years
  • Lack of railway siding frustrated Fergus’ James Gow
  • Fergus mill made oat flour for Cheerios, other brands
  • Railway passenger service waxed and waned over the 1900s
  • Tanner’s woolen mill in Mount Forest burned twice in a year
  • Elora principal George Edgcumbe ended his career in disgrace
  • Peter Perry a memorable principal of Fergus High School
  • Fire gutted Fergus building owned by Robert Kerr in 1931
  • WriteOut of Her Mind

  • Take a bow
  • Ice storm
  • Write on
  • Popcorn
  • Funny bunny
  • Big city
  • Parenting 101
  • Across the pond
  • column width padding column width padding column width padding

    The Wellington Advertiser





    Digital Publications


    Twitter Logo

    Free Press News Network Logo